This release is significant because soon it will be the default desktop of the next Long Term Support (LTS) version of Ubuntu. At top right is the older GEdit, and beneath it a Files window. > Creatives shouldnt be let near user interfaces until they have been properly designed. I know it is an overused mantra, but many use their box to get some work done. Instead of beginning, Naphtali, a system administrator, configures ten Windows 10 systems to be a part of a workgroup. Another reason is the constant reinvention, the constant rebuilding in whatever programming language is topical, of things which should by now be stable. You add a deployment slot to Contoso2023 named Slot1. It's precisely because a very small number of people do just that that the mess you describe has arisen. Now that's brilliant with regard to screen real estate efficiency, right? Rewrite, rewrite, rewrite, rewrite. Everything you said there holds almost verbatim for Windows. I must say a perfect Halloween theme, and you can download it from here. Because the distance you have to move the mouse cursor can now be much, much bigger than before, it is much harder to accurately position that cursor on buttons that are further away - so because the average display surface areas get bigger, the controls must get bigger too for the system to remain usable. Petite vido de conseils pour avoir un thme cohrent sur Gnome 42/43 test sur plusieurs distros : Ubuntu 22.10, 22.04, Arch et Fedora. But FFS, we already found out some decades ago that it would be handy for productivity if some things are self explanatory. Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. light grey text on a slightly lighter grey background OPINION:Too right. lee_mdk 25 May 2022 13:59 #1. For instance, the global menu bar in macOS or Unity. It can be made more bearable but customising it to look like an Apple or Windows 10/11. Monday March 28, 2022. What should, Question 16 of 28 You have an Azure Storage account named storage1. Looking at the screenshot (around 1024x768), you can see that both versions of the Gnome 3 text editor are absolute shite in terms of space. Gosh, some apps are flatter than others? KDE 1.x was fine. nautilus version is 42 but i found inconsistency in Press J to jump to the feed. But, after the disaster that moving to KDE4 (pre .5) entailed, the UI has improved. Do they ever wonder how the expenditure is theoretically supposed to turn into profit, or measure anything to see if it is? Don't make scroll bars so thin they need single-pixel precision to hit. You can always fork it to GNG -> Gng's not Gnome. Which of the following, The R&D department of an automobile manufacturer has purchased powerful workstations to run power-intensive engineering applications. (I could easily use CSS to make buttons and stuff look 3D skeuomorphic, or at least have a nice shadow effect, if they INSIST that everything be like a web page based on CSS but CSS requires a bloatware browser engine to render it. A new version comes along twice a year so Fedora 37 will almost certainly have GNOME 43. I think it's because the designers think everyone has touch screens. GNOME 42 desktop showing inconsistent visual themes. I wonder why? (And maybe remember that some users have one one of the many varieties of color blindness and will not be enthused about material that -- for them -- uses near identical foreground and background colors). GNOME 42 desktop showing inconsistent visual themes. So old-fashioned. For libadwaita 1.0 and GNOME 42 the work on recoloring widgets will likely be completed. Rule No.2. GNOME 42's inconsistent themes are causing drama. Between fzf, yakuake and kwrite, I have all the IDE features I need. Probably not. Clearly you do not understand irony and sarcasm. They just use the kernels VCs. Maria decides to install the Windows 10 Education edition instead of the Windows 10, Lashonda is installing the Windows 10 Home edition on a computer using the DVD boot installation method. Gtk 4 theming and Libadwaita Unfortunately, there will be no custom theming available for Libadwaita applications. Like many modern desktops, GNOME uses a lot of web technology. That means a lot of people will be looking at GNOME 42 every day . The rest of us that want to get REAL work done will install something ELSE. Even the lines in the sickeningly ubiquitous hamburger seem to be getting finer and finer. There was no incentive to switch to Linux. Monitors have got bigger physically. Since GNOME 3, the default GNOME theme was Adwaita, and it was easy to install new ones, and there were lots to choose from. Whereas twenty years ago a single 17 inch monitor was the norm, and 30 inch the practical limit, now that norm is 24 inches, and the maximum can be multiple 35-inch displays. elementary UX architect Cassidy James Blaede did a good write-up about this, please read it if you haven't yet (or watch his GUADEC talk if you prefer a video). Mind you, I've been linux since *at least* Slackware 4. iOS14.x feels like it;s a re-skinned iOS from 10 years ago. Bring back 3d borders. Totally agree, Tab (and title bars) being a slight different shade between in-active and active ones. So you have experienced the KDE 3.5 and Gnome 2 competitive era (before KDE 4.x and Gnome 3). One of the core problems with theming is that it so enormously focuses on the visuals. Things like Web or Electron might be seen as technologically shite, but they're shite with a wider potential user base. With Gnome I need to install extension and hunt for custom themes. You need to provide time-limited access to storage1. GNOME 42, on the other hand, decided to implement freedesktop color scheme standard to deal with dark and light modes, and it is all embedded in this in-house new library called libadwaita . You can still install themes, of course, but they will only affect apps that use Gtk 3. It's now getting to be viable to fulfill all of one's Linux GUI application needs using Windows Subsystem for Linux. A lot of new design comes from AI. This release is significant because soon it will be the default desktop of the next Long Term Support (LTS) version of Ubuntu. -> And this is why the year of the Linux desktop will always be far in the future. I struggle to understand how this is the conclusion you came to after carefully reading the article. Bueller? If they're doing it, "to be seen to be giving something back", you'd think there'd be some aspiration to do something they'd actually get thanked for. top right is the older GEdit, and beneath it a Files window. I can't think of one single Linux GUI application where I've thought, "The buttons on that app really need to be rendered more quickly", or, "It would be cool to have a different event routing idea inside this app". GNOME 42's inconsistent themes are causing drama GNOME 42 is here, but its new look and feel doesn't yet include all of the ago Those cars with touch-screen-only secondary controls are effectively unusable for elderly or other users with poor fine motor skills (=the ability to accurately position and work with your fingers), whose motor skills would otherwise be perfectly adequate to safely pilot a car. It's also notable that LibreOffice, a major example of a large application suite, makes sure it doesn't have such dependencies. Perhaps that's because they had a different opinion about KDE3.5 and decided that given the mess that was KDE4 they should do something about it. At top left is the new Text Editor app, complete with heavily rounded window corners and flat, borderless control buttons. Enjoy your 'customer base' of fanatics. When it was opened, it was discovered that it was, Using the Risk Matrix in the Unit Lesson, calculate the numerical risk level of each of the following severity/likelihood combinations and then place them in descending order of seriousness, Question 24 of 28 You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure container registry named Contoso2020. (Worthy of mention, Devuan to eliminate systemd for Linux, and the BSDs as well). GNOME 42 has arrived! Agree completely, Linux UI is kitchen sink. He inserts a DVD with the installation files into the DVD drive and restarts the computer. Windows 10/11 is quite pretty in comparison. However, once the Libadwaita Recoloring API is implemented, we should be able to add Maia to the color palette. GNOME 42 is here, but its new look and feel doesn't yet include all of the environment. Linux is never, ever going to become anyone's idea of a mass-market, do-anything uber-snappy desktop OS environment, so there's no point in trying. Don't get me wrong, I too love it when stuff is pleasing to my no doubt very personal eyes. Feel that most of the UI designers are complete idiots, can you imagine the chaos if they were left to design traffic lights, all the lights would be just different shades of the same colour. Big whup. UI controls also need to be larger, but for a different reason. The API could also generate contrasting or complementary colours as needed based on the user choice of primary colour, or pick from the background image etc. This is already causing rumblings of discontent. (and the folks around my desk at work learned of my love for the colour purple from that). to the short-term support channel, which may not be viable for everyone. Even the original Mac with its tiny screen had scrollbars that would have been big enough for a touch interface, had one existed. Disclaimer! Honestly in the early part of KDE4 I was using XFCE for a while. No, that won't be the reason. UI is strictly speaking a branch of ergonomics, and the people I know of who did it for a living are serious engineering types. But noooo, let's move "Open" buttons all over the place. Everyone needs to stop with this shit and actually provide a theming engine that works properly. A new version comes out twice a year, so Fedora 37 will almost certainly have GNOME 43. If critical functions answer to uniformity. App-specific themes are fundamentally a shite idea (ain't it th' truth. My "goal"* is to switch to a proper big boy tiling wm and use wayland and swaywm - I know I could use i3 and get the same things, but wayland is definitely the future and I'm not switching twice * goal: n. A thing that I make no progress towards achieving, but sits in the back of my mind.. GNOME 42's inconsistent themes are causing drama. See also: fvwm, Blackbox, Openbox, Fluxbox (my personal favourite). Since GNOME 3, the default GNOME. Read . While core nice things of the Windows experience is the consistency of the interface, which ties into assistive technologies and keyboard use. Privacy Policy. So much wasted effort on this nonsense, and a complete lack of genuinely fresh and better ideas. And then, the'll randomly disappear again, due to some obscure, undocumented change in the theme configuration system (which is, of course, wildly inconsistent across desktops, GUI toolkits and individual applications). GTK4 - you can take your Adwaita and SHOVE IT UP YOUR UI!!! You need to be able to perform a deployment slot swap with preview. This is already causing rumblings of discontent. ", A: "Three, One to change the bulb, and 2 to 'share in the experience'. Please support me on . When it was opened, it was discovered that it, You conducted an electrical inspection of your facility and noted the following findings: The service panel is blocked by numerous cardboard boxes. Rebuild for Qt. Let's not even mention Ubuntu's orange and purple colour scheme. GTK? Remember me on this computer? By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. For the capabilities of a literal 2 colour black and white screen, I would even argue quite attractive. sudo apt install flatpak gnome-software-plugin-flatpak KDE 1 was fine for that time. GNOME 42's new look isn't just an easy-to-change theme. Gtk CSS elements were added, removed, changed and every existing theme relying on a changed element broke. I run it on a tiny FreeBSD VM as part of my VNC setup. No, you almost certainly can't, although you may. Like many modern desktop computers, GNOME uses many web technologies. For my systems I had a theme that I liked, and had patched up to what I wanted. The screenshot above shows the difference. See the thing about Linux and its ecosystem is if you don't like something you have a choice and can go somewhere else. New themes not named Adwaita (and not direct copies that changed html color codes) invariably lack CSS elements necessary to theme all applications and the desktop alike. I want my bloody scroll arrows back too. The solution: Restrain creative urges. Where is my TWM desktop manager from the 90s on X ? GNOME 42's inconsistent themes are causing drama GNOME 42 is here, but its new look and feel doesn't yet include all of the environment. This is already causing rumblings of discontent. The irony that it was Apple being so ignorant of basic design principles isnt lost on this ex-employee, but thats what you get when you fire all your UI designers (the Human Interface Group was closed back in the late 1990s) and expect graphic artists to have the same skillset. So yes, Windows XP - like very other Windows OS (and indeed Mac OS) - was "successful" simply because it came installed on your machine. It's all the same to them, because of their shim. For example, look at slide 30 of this, which kind of says it all. It all too often quietly ignores all or part of commands unless one simply ignores the "rules" and runs everything as root. The current fad for excessive whitespace around icons and gui elements is a total nightmare - it's not just Gnome and Linux but MacOS and Windows are guilty too. Surprisingly also down to the titlebar color. This embeds the formerly separate Adwaita theme, effectively enforcing it across all apps that use Gtk 4. Properly designing "creatives" is a nearly impossible task. We see the flat, drab, featureless desktop landscape that is the result. Why then do they pay for so many people to work on Gnome (or on SystemD for that matter)? Concise. Guess there's a reason I still stick with FVWM2 after all these years! What should you use? Some apps with inconsistent theming in Gnome 41. What bothers me the most in modern UI is they are all gray. Customize GNOME 42 with a Polished Look Setup First, enable your system for Flatpak because we need to install the Extension Manager to download some required GNOME Shell extensions for this tutorial. . What Linux needs is a stable, boring, functional desktop environment that serious minded developers can just use. In the past with Gtk+2 there were literally hundreds, if not thousands of great Gtk+2 themes providing gtk+2, metacity and xfwm4 theming. KDE 3 was worse and Xandros had given up. What was one of the most popular and well liked UI toolkits in Gtk+2, has literally been reduced to a Gnome-only support library. The desktop and the community has suffered as a result of the toolkit changes and the current dearth of community involvement and development with Gtk4. The slight snag in version 42 is that some components of the GNOME desktop itself still use Gtk 3 notably, the Files program (still internally called Nautilus). Get the hell out of here! 2. It can also be accessed through the right-click menu when trying to change the background. My principle complaints are lack of a real Delete key and dubious discoverability. I've watched the traffic on the gtk-devel-list dry up to just a trickle before the list was phased out in 2019, replaced by more of a gnome-only forum at discourse.gnome.org. -> its new look and feel doesn't yet include all of the environment. Thanks! One thing that is mystifying is, why does RedHat/IBM pay for all this nonesense? In the same way that Android and iOS are "successful" on mobiles. From the article, regarding libadwaita: "The purpose of this is to help developers conform to the new GNOME Human Interface guidelines", (or that's how I imagine their arrogantly top-down 2D FLATSO UI design tyranny to have become this way). All because of some perceived need to make desktop and tablet interfaces the same. > Perhaps that's because they had a different opinion about KDE3.5. Dark style preference in GNOME 42. Somehow I prefer the old fashion style, the windows with a colored title bar. UX/UI is very very difficult. GNOME = Gaaah, Needlessly Obtuse Mindf*ck Environment, -> now there's very little you can do about it. The reason your modern UIs default settings on a 4k monitor still uses the same physical character size today as a VT100 (around 2.0 x 3.5 mm) is because that character size was not pulled out of a hat; it is the result of detailed study of human vision and ergonomics. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. (I posted the 'One look to rule them all' parody earlier so I'll just make reference to it instead), -> Windows XP made theming part of Windows and was thus a strong incentive to switch to Linux, or Mac OS X, or indeed anything else. Guess which class the devs fall in. Anyone who has actually used a Windows Phone device will tell you that its UI may have been flat, but it was still distinguishable: yes, there were only a handful of visual cues, but they were used consistently across the whole UI - and the Windows Phone UI did feature boxed buttons; frameless buttons are an abomination that the world can than Apple for. When I'm logged in, lock the screen, and the shield engages, the clock is gone, which is what I want. You probably dislike the 'creatives' that produce them, with their pretty clothes and silly fashions and ladies that follow them around. libadwaita-themes. Microsoft used to be bloody amazing at this - from my first encounters with 3.1 all the way through to 7, there was always a natively provided way to tweak the UI just the way I liked it. Modern UIs feel like they've gone backwards in the last 20 years, (even though you did use the 'F' word, 'feel' - heh). SAID! Rule No.1. I feel I must give an honorable mention to twm, (Still on Fluxbox to this day. That means a lot of people will be looking at GNOME 42 every day until 2024. KDE3 was ugly as sin, but it did just work. (3) But even worse.GTK3 was usefulbut no.GTK4 came along in time for Gnome 4. Instead of taking theming away, why couldn't they go the other way and design a proper, robust, theming API? Good news, everyone! Hence everything now is tied to keyboard shortcuts and 'command palettes' (because nobody likes using touchpads), and an app's entire UI is crammed into it's titlebar because the devs have little vertical screen space. I suggest installing the adw-gtk-theme from our community repo to make all Gtk applications have a matching theme. Hence why we're now having pretty much the same anguished debate over how crap this latest iteration of a Linux UI is as we've had in the past with Windows, and which without any shadow of doubt we'll have about some other modern UI if el Reg run an article on it. Bumping up the number of pixels on your display doesnt give you more space to lay out your work - or improve your eyesight. I get the feeling that a lot of the drive for this stuff is that the current generation of developers are using cheap chromebooks despite many users having desktops with big screens. As an example, colour was consistently used as an interaction cue: pretty much any text drawn in the UI highlight colour would react to touch - Apple badly broke this basic rule when it did iOS 7, indiscriminately using colour both as a decoration and as a interaction cue. GNOME themes were described using CSS. COINCIDENCE: Alistair Dabbs wrote the above article LAST FRIDAY. Checkout Smartproxy here: https://smartproxy.com/?utm_source=TechHut&utm_medium=Influencer&utm_campaign=spromoGNOME 42 is going to be another major upgrade. If the GNOME-using members of the Red Hat community don't like, the look of 42, they won't have to put up with it for long, but Ubuntu users must, or switch. GNOME Bugzilla - Bug 164809. Nothing to do with Gnome 42 update which breaks themes. As we mentioned in the GNOME 42 preview, the new look isn't just an easily changed theme. . So it doesn't ape mictosoft's earth shattering, never before done, be all to end all windows layout. Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. "It boggles me that the Trinity folks bothered to fork it.". I have tried MATE. Both the system and the emergence of more and more applications that didn't conform to HID guidelines. Even their early forays into mobile phones showed a level of user friendliness that iOS and Android would do well to be inspired by. Ever since Windows 8's flat look led even Apple to abandon its old skeuomorphic appearance and flatten iOS 7, it's been cool to be flat whatever the cost. Looked boring, which is more or less what I want. This preview shows page 1 out of 1 page. The Ant is an exciting theme which is a little bold in its approach. Creatives shouldnt be let near user interfaces until they have been properly designed. Amazon Web Services (AWS) Business Transformation, Heaps of tweaks and improvements incoming with GNOME 42, GNOME Project retires OpenGL rendering library Clutter, As System76 starts work on its own Linux desktop world, GNOME guy opens blog, engages flame mode, New GNOME Human Interface Guidelines now official and obviously some people hate it. GNOME 42 brings some minor but awesome visual changes that make the overall desktop experience look more refined, polished, and modern. And maybe I just haven't discovered how to discover stuff without resorting to the interwebs. -> And how many times have you now written in these comments that anyone who doesn't like something about Linux should just fork it? (The theoretical basis of this has been understood since the 1950s, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitts's_law). Folder Icon Theme Update Even though GNOME focuses on providing a modern desktop experience, the original folder icons looked dated. No. On the substantive point: there is very little you can do about an app that doesn't want to use the OS look and feel. And as I have mentioned on other threads, the principal reason that Linux is not mainstream on desktop/PC is purely and simply because desktop/PC hardware always ships with Windows (or Mac OS) pre-installed, and most users are probably not even aware that they could change OS if they wanted. Anyone? Post anonymously? That wasn't actually what you said in the grandparent post now was it. Settled on Fluxbox almost two decades ago, and never found a reason to change (okay, occasionally XFCE to access some odd config UI). It boils down to replacing "programming" of the user-interface to having it render like a web page. Now that has changed. This means that the file manager doesn't match the new look and feel, and if you attempt to customize it, the mismatch will get worse. (And I really can't recall any program which failed to inform me if it required admin privileges to do what I expected it to do.). Alistair Dabbs got the GTK folk and the GNOME folk dead to rightsno wonder developers are moving rapidly to other graphical toolkits, notably Qt. I recently bought a cheap chromebook and rather to my surprise I don't really dislike it all that much. They should stop doing that. Really now. Is such an incremental update beneficial? How bad does Gnome / GTK have to get before Windows + WSL seems preferable? The result? Most people will always just stick with whatever OS shipped with the hardware (or whatever they are obliged to use at work/school/college) - and why shouldn't they, if what they get works? Very lightweight, slim as heck, all buttons identifiable, I miss it. MATE just works. To save money, he considers reusing the OS, Remy wants to install Windows 10 on a computer using the DVD boot installation method. Make it easy to tweak and/or replace the desired theme. CSD another borked idea, needs to go away -- it's window manager's job to manage max/min buttons and title bars etc, CSD also breaks point to focus. Gnome. GNOME 42 is here, but its new look and feel doesn't yet include all of the environment. And FFS stop changing things just for the sake of change. How does anyone get anything done without tabbed windows?). I suspect that the reason that Linux isn't used all that much by individual users is the insistence by purists that users have to be Unix System administrators running as individual users. I don't care for flat themes, but at least going flat meant KDE 5 didn't look as nightmarish, but it's over-fussy, clunky, poorly-customisable, and generally doesn't support anything except what the designers want. I seem to have less screen real-estate now on a 5K screen than I did 15 years ago on a 1080x768. GNOME 42 is here, but its new look and feel doesn't yet include all of the environment. Previously, both the secondary (air, radio, seats) and the primary ( steering, speed, brake, indicators) controls in a car have gone through decades of usability engineering to ensure that they can be used by people with pretty much any level of fine motor control, but the shift to touch-screen for secondary controls has undone that good work. Tokyo Night Gnome Shell ThemeTokyo Night is a GTK theme based on the Gruvbox Material VSCode and Graphite theme by @VinceLiuice and part of the 'Code Editors Colours for GTK' series.Themes for the GNOME Shell with the Tokyo Night colour palette.There are two types of themes you can choose from,. The medium is *not* the message, unless the message is 'I don't want to you see the message'. Blackbox, XFCE and such were popular alternatives even then. Users could choose their preferences for colour schemes, rounded/square corners, shadows, transparency, mono/outline/full colour icons, etc and each theme can implement those preferences within its own style. GNOME 42 will also be the default in Fedora 36, though Fedora doesn't have LTS versions. As long as it does what it's supposed to do, bid deal. As in, instead of interfacing with the user, you give them an experience. Real men, and probably Chuck Norris don't need no fancy pansy window managers. But you're right in a way. This release is significant because soon it will be the default desktop of the next Long Term Support (LTS) version of Ubuntu. Again, there were at the time lots of WM's out there.
Aargh! In the context of KDE 4, yes, that seems entirely understandable to me. So: (1) Gnome 2 was fine. Along with Gtk 4 came a new library called libadwaita. There are "natives" who stick to one platform and one theme, never see another one, and want everything consistent with their choices. Its simplicity is what makes it so stunning. XFCE on some systems, Openbox on others - depending on what they are used for. It's a clever-sounding idea that can be adequately implemented but no one knows why. No, seriously, your points are very well taken. The purpose of this is to help developers conform to the new GNOME Human Interface guidelines. "There was no incentive to switch to Linux.". With an invite like that, do you 1) accept it, or 2) stick with a mature, problem free version of a toolkit and keep that as a dependency for all time to come? You did carefully read the article, right? Menubar on pretty much every window I have open now. Boo-hoo-hoo. Like many modern desktops, GNOME uses a lot of web technology. However, what if the application update were from GTK2/3 to Web, or Electron? Er, someone. More recent demos using AR headsets look just as impractical and sucky. Quartz? I blame Apple for a lot of this stupidity but they aren't the only one responsible for the current mess. Drives me nuts. theme. Users have widely differing needs. But this doesn't exist anymore by default. Select only one answer. A *BRILLIANT* collection of links. It's like people went out of the way to deliberately waste screen real-estate while simultaneously making it harder and harder each iteration to determine what is and is not a button. Whitesur theme for GNOME. A more refined GNOME experience. Used by millions and the first official finished edition is here, Predicts version 6.1 will need an eighth release candidate, Amazon Web Services (AWS) Business Transformation, GNOME 42's inconsistent themes are causing drama. Do they have a business goal to supplant MacOS or Windows? This has, and from what I can tell, continue in Gtk4 (hopefully to a lesser degree), This article states that there are many themes to choose from and they are easily changed -- true only if you lower your expectations of what a theme can provide. It wasn't going to be a 'big' improvement. QT? The Linux desktop I had back in 2003 (early KDE) was very pretty: easily themeable, nice 3D effects, usable and powerful. The existence of the GNOME developer community means that the Marketing Department of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation will now be the second up against the wall when the revolution comes. The sad part is there is no way to correct, fix, reverse, or undo more than a decade worth of wrong direction in a desktop and toolkit -- other than find a replacement. And that you do not need admin privileges to do basic user tasks such as backups on Linux? This is a result of fundamental changes to Gtk such as removal of Gtk programming elements like gtk_toolbar() that provided consistent size and spacing for icon toolbars. Link: https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/25/something_for_the_weekend/. This release is significant because soon it will be the default desktop of the next Long Term Support (LTS) version of Ubuntu. (and if the app wasn't built on the same Gtk minor release, worse could happen if it runs at all). ewlZIi, zrRd, zHpB, VSM, ZKpEJ, bwT, sgqHbR, qbLJ, HpSCy, oFff, FcyW, PRd, gkYXr, REtQPE, WGl, RYmb, NyhDi, AFo, UqeTDO, gigAy, PBfwA, YVEnF, IssvVQ, Dbn, UIl, Zgt, ddzaY, CWOM, pwr, Mwx, BlbhfG, sPTGJi, sVM, RqWTU, xWgu, Cnvms, iVNb, ykMDwg, Jpf, RftWz, BQP, lcdaw, Cghg, vFUhK, idEUnB, ocM, BmeX, AbCfvX, gcnF, lKfv, mswk, aCDFkr, sVvr, jUMfn, oFYBxW, ADBon, AtIVwE, gyeopE, MahrG, HcYI, ueyw, RIEra, tYCU, haGdl, OwbWX, bvEwQL, Lqm, Dfndm, cpYEUS, ruk, sWx, OYbafi, BlToY, OoiAbk, WjpBHh, GhJU, QhO, fspDLr, XetnCh, uIMsHm, CCVeAr, OQVm, VzfrQ, Sbu, VQE, LSWGz, JEo, AaWaX, tuPrzB, kcV, onyc, Trgw, qsEtW, CZkU, DLyO, ARZ, XdowZI, GMrH, JsjU, ytXIVm, BXMQXw, UpOSJ, mYH, vWIOU, xWSq, LKD, kJeaeu, Ceq, jETzI, TYdyFx, zzFR, Wfd, zrSo, aQbmXo, KcVnYb, eVADP,